Wojciech Marek

Male, Age 39 Seymour, Connecticut

Wojciech Marek is a 39 years old male, born on Monday, 2nd of July 1984. He will turn 40 on July 02, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 20 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3835 and is not affiliated with any political party. Wojciech is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 11, 2016. Our records show Agnieszka S Marek (41) as possible relative.

Overview of Wojciech Marek

Age: 39

Gender: male

Birth year: 1984

Lives in: Seymour

Phone number: 203-343-9873

Wojciech Marek's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 11, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: District 3 Chatfieldlopresti School

Voter ID: 004686587

Congressional District: 003

House District: 105

Senate District: 032

Wojciech Marek Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Wojciech Marek

14 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3835
No known party affiliation
15 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
16 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3835
No known party affiliation
17 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
17 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
18 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3835
No known party affiliation
19 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
21 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
21 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
23 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation
25 Argyle Circle, Seymour, Ct 06483-3803
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Wojciech Marek's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Seymour, Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 3rd of November 1981
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $77,054

Net Worth: $1,305,921

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.