Hases Utee Davies

Male, Age 58 Waterbury , Connecticut

Hases Utee Davies is a 58 years old male, born on Sunday, 17th of May 1964. He will turn 59 on May 17, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 696 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Hases is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 3, 2016.

Overview of Hases Utee Davies

Age: 58

Gender: male

Birth year: 1964

Lives in: Waterbury

Hases Utee Davies's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 3, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 03

District: 073

Polling place: Kingsbury School

Voter ID: 004673770

Congressional District: 005

House District: 073

Senate District: 015

Hases Utee Davies Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Hases Utee Davies

689 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1109
No known party affiliation
689 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1109
No known party affiliation
690 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106
No known party affiliation
690 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106
No known party affiliation
693 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1109
No known party affiliation
693 Cooke Street 2, Waterbury , 06710-1109
No known party affiliation
693 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1109
No known party affiliation
696 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106
No known party affiliation
696 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106
No known party affiliation
702 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106
No known party affiliation
702 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1106
No known party affiliation
707 Cooke Street, Waterbury , 06710-1109
No known party affiliation
715 Cooke Street 1, Waterbury , 06710-1111
No known party affiliation
721 Cooke Street 1, Waterbury , 06710-1111
No known party affiliation
721 Cooke Street 1, Waterbury , 06710-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $19,958

Net Worth: $67,647

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.