Seung K Bak

Male, Age 46 Greenwich , Connecticut

Seung K Bak is a 46 years old male, born on Sunday, 31st of July 1977. He will turn 47 on July 31, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 265 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726 and is not affiliated with any political party. Seung is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 29, 2016.

Overview of Seung K Bak

Age: 46

Gender: male

Birth year: 1978

Lives in: Greenwich

Seung K Bak's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 29, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 008

Polling place: Central Middle School

Voter ID: 004665790

Congressional District: 004

House District: 151

Senate District: 036

Seung K Bak Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Seung K Bak

230 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1727
No known party affiliation
241 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
241 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
249 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
249 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
255 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
259 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
265 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1726
No known party affiliation
271 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1811
No known party affiliation
271 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-0000
No known party affiliation
271 Valley Road, Greenwich , Ct 06807-0000
No known party affiliation
274 Valley Road 1, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1812
No known party affiliation
274 Valley Road 2, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1812
No known party affiliation
274 Valley Road 3, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1812
No known party affiliation
274 Valley Road Apt 1, Greenwich , Ct 06807-1812
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $88,430

Net Worth: $964,842

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.