Loredana Giacca

Female, Age 68 Watertown , Connecticut

Loredana Giacca is a 68 years old female, born on Tuesday, 12th of January 1954. She will turn 69 on January 12, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 200 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920 and is not affiliated with any political party. Loredana is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 27, 2016.

Overview of Loredana Giacca

Age: 68

Gender: female

Birth year: 1954

Lives in: Watertown

Loredana Giacca's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 27, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Swift Middle School

Voter ID: 004657810

Congressional District: 005

House District: 068

Senate District: 032

Loredana Giacca Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Loredana Giacca

175 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1944
No known party affiliation
184 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920
No known party affiliation
184 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920
No known party affiliation
189 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1919
No known party affiliation
194 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920
No known party affiliation
194 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920
No known party affiliation
194 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920
No known party affiliation
201 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1919
No known party affiliation
201 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-0000
No known party affiliation
201 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-0000
No known party affiliation
211 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1943
No known party affiliation
211 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1943
No known party affiliation
216 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1920
No known party affiliation
227 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1943
No known party affiliation
227 Morro Street, Watertown , 06779-1943
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $89,914

Net Worth: $938,442

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.