John Michael Packes Jr

Male, Age 47 Norwalk, Connecticut

John Michael Packes Jr is a 47 years old male, born on Friday, 21st of May 1976. He will turn 48 on May 21, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 5 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. John is registered to vote in Connecticut since December 13, 2016.

Overview of John Michael Packes Jr

Age: 47

Gender: male

Birth year: 1976

Lives in: Norwalk

John Michael Packes Jr's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: December 13, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 03

District: 142

Polling place: West Rocks Middle School

Voter ID: 004655837

Congressional District: 004

House District: 142

Senate District: 025

John Michael Packes Jr Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for John Michael Packes Jr

2 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1513
No known party affiliation
2 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1513
No known party affiliation
3 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
3 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
3 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
3 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
4 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1513
No known party affiliation
5 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
7 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
8 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1513
No known party affiliation
8 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1513
No known party affiliation
9 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
9 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
9 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1512
No known party affiliation
10 Skyview Lane, Norwalk, Ct 06851-1513
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $100,307

Net Worth: $63,596

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.