Karen Wang

Female, Age 47 New Haven , Connecticut

Karen Wang is a 47 years old female, born on Friday, 28th of May 1976. She will turn 48 on May 28, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 2 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328 and is not affiliated with any political party. Karen is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 20, 2016.

Overview of Karen Wang

Age: 47

Gender: female

Birth year: 1976

Lives in: New Haven

Karen Wang's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 20, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 019

Polling place: Celentano Museum Academy

Voter ID: 004647250

Congressional District: 003

House District: 094

Senate District: 011

Karen Wang Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Karen Wang

3 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1327
No known party affiliation
3 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1327
No known party affiliation
3 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1327
No known party affiliation
4 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
4 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
4 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
4 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
7 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1327
No known party affiliation
9 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1327
No known party affiliation
12 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
12 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
12 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
12 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
12 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1328
No known party affiliation
15 Edgehill Road, New Haven , Ct 06511-1327
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $118,114

Net Worth: $1,343,142

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.