Nazim Guseynov

Male, Age 60 Shelton, Connecticut

Nazim Guseynov is a 60 years old male, born on Wednesday, 17th of October 1962. He will turn 61 on October 17, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 15 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Nazim is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 19, 2016.

Overview of Nazim Guseynov

Age: 60

Gender: male

Birth year: 1963

Lives in: Shelton

Nazim Guseynov's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 19, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Long Hill School

Voter ID: 004646283

Congressional District: 004

House District: 122

Senate District: 021

Nazim Guseynov Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Nazim Guseynov

6 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
7 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
7 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
8 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
9 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
9 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
9 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
15 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
16 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5449
No known party affiliation
17 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5458
No known party affiliation
17 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5458
No known party affiliation
17 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5458
No known party affiliation
24 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5458
No known party affiliation
24 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5458
No known party affiliation
25 Waterford Lane, Shelton, Ct 06484-5458
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $30,250

Net Worth: $1,353,861

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.