Joseph A Skaleski

Male, Age 31 Windham, Connecticut

Joseph A Skaleski is a 31 years old male, born on Monday, 9th of December 1991. He will turn 32 on December 09, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 89 Foster Drive D, Windham, Ct 06226-1553 and is not affiliated with any political party. Joseph is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 13, 2016.

Overview of Joseph A Skaleski

Age: 31

Gender: male

Birth year: 1992

Lives in: Windham

Joseph A Skaleski's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 13, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Vfw

Voter ID: 004641926

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Joseph A Skaleski Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Joseph A Skaleski

66 Foster Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation
66 Foster Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-1557
No known party affiliation
70 Foster Drive, Windham, Ct 06226-1557
No known party affiliation
71 Foster Drive H, Windham, Ct 06226-1551
No known party affiliation
71 Foster Drive E, Windham, Ct 06226-1551
No known party affiliation
73 Foster Drive E, Windham, Ct 06226-1552
No known party affiliation
73 Foster Drive Apt D, Windham, Ct 06226-1552
No known party affiliation
89 Foster Drive D, Windham, Ct 06226-1553
No known party affiliation
89 Foster Drive A, Windham, Ct 06226-1553
No known party affiliation
89 Foster Drive F, Windham, Ct 06226-1553
No known party affiliation
89 Foster Drive Apt B, Windham, Ct 06226-1553
No known party affiliation
91 Foster Drive E, Windham, Ct 06226-1554
No known party affiliation
91 Foster Drive C, Windham, Ct 06226-1554
No known party affiliation
91 Foster Drive B, Windham, Ct 06226-1554
No known party affiliation
91 Foster Drive A, Windham, Ct 06226-1554
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $70,911

Net Worth: $1,266,636

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.

View More Results for Skaleski