Elise Jackson

Female, Age 71 Enfield, Connecticut

Elise Jackson is a 71 years old female, born on Tuesday, 18th of December 1951. She will turn 72 on December 18, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 10 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Elise is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 9, 2016.

Overview of Elise Jackson

Age: 71

Gender: female

Birth year: 1952

Lives in: Enfield

Elise Jackson's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 9, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 258

Polling place: Enfield Street School

Voter ID: 004620270

Congressional District: 002

House District: 058

Senate District: 007

Elise Jackson Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Elise Jackson

5 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation
5 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation
10 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
12 Russell Street Back, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
12 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
16 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
16 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
18 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
19 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation
19 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation
20 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
21 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation
22 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3317
No known party affiliation
25 Russell Street, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation
25 Russell Street B, Enfield, Ct 06082-3316
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $84,285

Net Worth: $454,376

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.