Rajendra Khadka

Male, Age 47 Branford, Connecticut

Rajendra Khadka is a 47 years old male, born on Friday, 21st of May 1976. He will turn 48 on May 21, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 5 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rajendra is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 26, 2016.

Overview of Rajendra Khadka

Age: 47

Gender: male

Birth year: 1977

Lives in: Branford

Phone number: 203-392-4748

Rajendra Khadka's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 26, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Mary T. Murphy School

Voter ID: 004612617

Congressional District: 003

House District: 102

Senate District: 012

Rajendra Khadka Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rajendra Khadka

2 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
2 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
4 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
05 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
6 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
7 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
8 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
8 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
8 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
9 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
9 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
10 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
11 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
12 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2629
No known party affiliation
13 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2628
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $25,161

Net Worth: $880,599

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.