Sheekha Sethi

Female, Age 36 Greenwich , Connecticut

Sheekha Sethi is a 36 years old female, born on Saturday, 28th of June 1986. She will turn 37 on June 28, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sheekha is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 5, 2016.

Overview of Sheekha Sethi

Age: 36

Gender: female

Birth year: 1986

Lives in: Greenwich

Sheekha Sethi's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 5, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 010

Polling place: Glenville School

Voter ID: 004606389

Congressional District: 004

House District: 149

Senate District: 036

Sheekha Sethi Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sheekha Sethi

26 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
26 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
28 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
28 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
30 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
34 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
34 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3742
No known party affiliation
47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740
No known party affiliation
47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740
No known party affiliation
47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-0000
No known party affiliation
47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740
No known party affiliation
47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740
No known party affiliation
47 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-0000
No known party affiliation
49 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740
No known party affiliation
49 Round Hill Road, Greenwich , 06831-3740
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $103,976

Net Worth: $384,251

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.