Miguel A Olmo

Male, Age 55 Windham, Connecticut

Miguel A Olmo is a 55 years old male, born on Wednesday, 6th of November 1968. He will turn 56 on November 06, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 245 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434 and is not affiliated with any political party. Miguel is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 2, 2016.

Overview of Miguel A Olmo

Age: 55

Gender: male

Birth year: 1969

Lives in: Windham

Miguel A Olmo's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 2, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Vfw

Voter ID: 004590061

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Miguel A Olmo Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Miguel A Olmo

227 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
227 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
227 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
227 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
231 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
231 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
242 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2433
No known party affiliation
245 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
245 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2434
No known party affiliation
248 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2433
No known party affiliation
248 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2433
No known party affiliation
248 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2433
No known party affiliation
248 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2433
No known party affiliation
248 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-2433
No known party affiliation
251 Lewiston Avenue, Windham, Ct 06226-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $97,825

Net Worth: $1,094,642

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.