Sara Rene Jalbert

Female, Age 28 Watertown , Connecticut

Sara Rene Jalbert is a 28 years old female, born on Wednesday, 29th of December 1993. She will turn 29 on December 29, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 66 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712 and is not affiliated with any political party. Sara is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 27, 2016.

Overview of Sara Rene Jalbert

Age: 28

Gender: female

Birth year: 1994

Lives in: Watertown

Sara Rene Jalbert's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 27, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Judson School

Voter ID: 004588355

Congressional District: 005

House District: 068

Senate District: 032

Sara Rene Jalbert Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sara Rene Jalbert

56 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation
56 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation
56 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation
65 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
65 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
65 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
65 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
66 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation
66 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation
66 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation
75 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
75 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
75 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
75 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1711
No known party affiliation
76 Dunrobin Lane, Watertown , 06795-1712
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $94,335

Net Worth: $1,160,779

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.