Elisandra Matos

Female, Age 48 Windham, Connecticut

Elisandra Matos is a 48 years old female, born on Tuesday, 5th of February 1974. She will turn 49 on February 05, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 96 Chestnut Street Apt 1, Windham, 06226-2402 and is not affiliated with any political party. Elisandra is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 14, 2016.

Overview of Elisandra Matos

Age: 48

Gender: female

Birth year: 1974

Lives in: Windham

Phone number: 860-230-5769

Elisandra Matos's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 14, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Vfw

Voter ID: 004568917

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Elisandra Matos Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Elisandra Matos

74 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
74 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
81 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2401
No known party affiliation
86 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
88 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
94 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
94 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
96 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
96 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2402
No known party affiliation
101 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2403
No known party affiliation
101 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2403
No known party affiliation
102 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2404
No known party affiliation
111 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2403
No known party affiliation
111 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2403
No known party affiliation
112 Chestnut Street, Windham, 06226-2404
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $28,336

Net Worth: $776,891

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.