1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06226 Windham
  4. Jackson Street

Raquel Lee Luna

Female, Age 37 Windham, Connecticut

Raquel Lee Luna is a 37 years old female, born on Tuesday, 13th of August 1985. She will turn 38 on August 13, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 619 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-0000 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Raquel is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 14, 2016. Our records show Pedro A Luna (37) as possible relative.

Overview of Raquel Lee Luna

Age: 37

Gender: female

Birth year: 1985

Lives in: Windham

Phone number: 860-639-4373

Raquel Lee Luna's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 14, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 004568705

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Raquel Lee Luna Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

619 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-0000

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Raquel Lee Luna

Jean Rios(54)
561 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1625
No known party affiliation
Jared M Maddenszabo(29)
561 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1625
No known party affiliation
Zacariah Ramos(28)
561 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1625
No known party affiliation
Rosa D Diaz(54)
564 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1627
No known party affiliation
Natalie Rose Borgas(21)
564 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1627
No known party affiliation
Luis J Diaz(48)
564 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1627
No known party affiliation
Joy E Fleming(42)
577 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-1633
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 619 Jackson Street, Windham, 06226-0000

Related Persons

Raquel Lee Luna's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(37)
Windham, Ct
Born on: Friday, 1st of March 1985
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $45,893

Net Worth: $660,245

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.