Lydia Kendall Cross

Female, Age 24 Redding, Connecticut

Lydia Kendall Cross is a 24 years old female, born on Thursday, 15th of October 1998. She will turn 25 on October 15, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 5 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Lydia is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 14, 2016.

Overview of Lydia Kendall Cross

Age: 24

Gender: female

Birth year: 1999

Lives in: Redding

Lydia Kendall Cross's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 14, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Redding Community Center

Voter ID: 004568107

Congressional District: 004

House District: 135

Senate District: 026

Lydia Kendall Cross Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lydia Kendall Cross

3 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
3 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
3 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
4 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2801
No known party affiliation
5 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
5 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
5 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
9 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
9 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
10 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2801
No known party affiliation
10 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2801
No known party affiliation
10 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2801
No known party affiliation
11 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
11 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2802
No known party affiliation
14 Fox Run Road, Redding, Ct 06896-2801
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $12,509

Net Worth: $489,947

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.