Josh Aj Barbour

Male, Age 37 Waterbury , Connecticut

Josh Aj Barbour is a 37 years old male, born on Monday, 17th of March 1986. He will turn 38 on March 17, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 10 Anesa Avenue 3, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1282 and is not affiliated with any political party. Josh is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 13, 2016.

Overview of Josh Aj Barbour

Age: 37

Gender: male

Birth year: 1986

Lives in: Waterbury

Phone number: 860-593-8420

Josh Aj Barbour's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 13, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 04

District: 072

Polling place: Regan School

Voter ID: 004566562

Congressional District: 005

House District: 072

Senate District: 015

Josh Aj Barbour Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Josh Aj Barbour

5 Anesa Avenue C, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
7 Anesa Avenue 9, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
7 Anesa Avenue B, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
7 Anesa Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
7 Anesa Avenue B, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
10 Anesa Avenue 2, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1282
No known party affiliation
10 Anesa Avenue 3, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1282
No known party affiliation
10 Anesa Avenue 1, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1282
No known party affiliation
10 Anesa Avenue 3, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1282
No known party affiliation
10 Anesa Avenue 1, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1282
No known party affiliation
15 Anesa Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
17 Anesa Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
17 Anesa Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06704-0000
No known party affiliation
17 Anesa Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation
19 Anesa Avenue, Waterbury , Ct 06704-1202
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $43,387

Net Worth: $330,271

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.