1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06351 Griswold
  4. Amanda Lane

Dorota Lawadski

Female, Age 42 Griswold , Connecticut

Dorota Lawadski is a 42 years old female, born on Tuesday, 24th of March 1981. She will turn 43 on March 24, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 26 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Dorota is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 21, 2016.

Overview of Dorota Lawadski

Age: 42

Gender: female

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Griswold

Phone number: 774-268-1513

Dorota Lawadski's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 21, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Griswold High School

Voter ID: 004549928

Congressional District: 002

House District: 045

Senate District: 018

Dorota Lawadski Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

26 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Dorota Lawadski

Jeffrey S Walter(68)
16 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604
No known party affiliation
Thomas P Socha(52)
19 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2605
No known party affiliation
Jennifer L Socha(52)
19 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2605
No known party affiliation
Evan T Socha(23)
19 Amanda Lane F, Griswold , Ct 06351-2605
No known party affiliation
Mason D Rubino(23)
22 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604
No known party affiliation
Lauralee M Rubino(50)
22 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604
No known party affiliation
Dean M Rubino(50)
22 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604
No known party affiliation
Tammy Lynn Sankow(55)
26 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604
No known party affiliation
Lukasz C Zawadzki(40)
26 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 26 Amanda Lane, Griswold , Ct 06351-2604

Income

Salary: $109,167

Net Worth: $508,260

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.