Gui Ying Mai

Female, Age 41 Hamden , Connecticut

Gui Ying Mai is a 41 years old female, born on Saturday, 5th of September 1981. She will turn 42 on September 05, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 20 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002 and is not affiliated with any political party. Gui Ying is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 14, 2016.

Overview of Gui Ying Mai

Age: 41

Gender: female

Birth year: 1982

Lives in: Hamden

Phone number: 203-494-7056

Gui Ying Mai's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 14, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 007

Polling place: Dunbar Hill School

Voter ID: 004544897

Congressional District: 003

House District: 091

Senate District: 017

Gui Ying Mai Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Gui Ying Mai

20 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
21 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3001
No known party affiliation
24 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
24 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
25 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3001
No known party affiliation
25 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3001
No known party affiliation
28 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-0000
No known party affiliation
28 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
28 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
32 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
32 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
35 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3044
No known party affiliation
36 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
36 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation
36 Benham Street, Hamden , Ct 06514-3002
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $47,987

Net Worth: $183,435

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.