Sita Thapa

Female, Age 36 Branford, Connecticut

Sita Thapa is a 36 years old female, born on Monday, 12th of January 1987. She will turn 37 on January 12, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 66 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Sita is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 5, 2015.

Overview of Sita Thapa

Age: 36

Gender: female

Birth year: 1987

Lives in: Branford

Phone number: 203-848-0717

Sita Thapa's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 5, 2015

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Mary T. Murphy School

Voter ID: 004509497

Congressional District: 003

House District: 102

Senate District: 012

Sita Thapa Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Sita Thapa

60 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
62 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
62 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
63 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
63 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
63 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
64 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
66 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
67 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
67 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
67 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
69 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
69 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2662
No known party affiliation
70 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2663
No known party affiliation
70 Bay Path Way, Branford, Ct 06405-2663
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $61,552

Net Worth: $815,698

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.