Tobie L Schuerfeld

Female, Age 47 New Haven , Connecticut

Tobie L Schuerfeld is a 47 years old female, born on Friday, 31st of January 1975. She will turn 48 on January 31, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 76 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Tobie is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 1, 2015.

Overview of Tobie L Schuerfeld

Age: 47

Gender: female

Birth year: 1975

Lives in: New Haven

Tobie L Schuerfeld's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 1, 2015

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 018

Polling place: Nathan Hale School

Voter ID: 004497257

Congressional District: 003

House District: 097

Senate District: 011

Tobie L Schuerfeld Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Tobie L Schuerfeld

71 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3959
No known party affiliation
72 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
72 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
73 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3959
No known party affiliation
74 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
74 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
75 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3959
No known party affiliation
80 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
80 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
80 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
91 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3959
No known party affiliation
94 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
94 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3958
No known party affiliation
95 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3959
No known party affiliation
95 Parker Place, New Haven , 06512-3959
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $105,839

Net Worth: $625,429

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.