Rakeem Williams

Male, Age 26 West Haven , Connecticut

Rakeem Williams is a 26 years old male, born on Friday, 4th of April 1997. He will turn 27 on April 04, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 10 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rakeem is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 18, 2015.

Overview of Rakeem Williams

Age: 26

Gender: male

Birth year: 1998

Lives in: West Haven

Rakeem Williams's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 18, 2015

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 007

Polling place: Ann V. Molloy School

Voter ID: 004476850

Congressional District: 003

House District: 116

Senate District: 010

Rakeem Williams Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rakeem Williams

3 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
3 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
3 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
4 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
10 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
10 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
10 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
11 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
11 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
15 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
15 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2923
No known party affiliation
16 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
20 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
20 Nacca Road D, West Haven , Ct 06516-2922
No known party affiliation
20 Nacca Road, West Haven , Ct 06516-0000
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $13,209

Net Worth: $1,411,700

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.