Naseema Masood

Female, Age 73 Torrington , Connecticut

Naseema Masood is a 73 years old female, born on Sunday, 30th of January 1949. She will turn 74 on January 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 423 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Naseema is registered to vote in Connecticut since December 8, 2014.

Overview of Naseema Masood

Age: 73

Gender: female

Birth year: 1949

Lives in: Torrington

Naseema Masood's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: December 8, 2014

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Torrington Middle School

Voter ID: 004458277

Congressional District: 001

House District: 063

Senate District: 008

Naseema Masood Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Naseema Masood

397 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
406 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4227
No known party affiliation
406 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4227
No known party affiliation
406 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4227
No known party affiliation
411 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
411 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
422 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4227
No known party affiliation
423 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
439 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
439 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
448 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4227
No known party affiliation
451 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
465 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
465 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation
465 Oxbow Drive, Torrington , 06790-4226
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $74,869

Net Worth: $1,200,482

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.