Leah Peck

Female, Age 46 New Haven , Connecticut

Leah Peck is a 46 years old female, born on Sunday, 17th of April 1977. She will turn 47 on April 17, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 26 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Leah is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 10, 2018.

Overview of Leah Peck

Age: 46

Gender: female

Birth year: 1978

Lives in: New Haven

Leah Peck's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 10, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 026

Polling place: Davis Street School

Voter ID: 004448854

Congressional District: 003

House District: 092

Senate District: 010

Leah Peck Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Leah Peck

18 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-0000
No known party affiliation
18 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618
No known party affiliation
24 Plant Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06515-1641
No known party affiliation
24 Plant Street 3, New Haven , Ct 06515-0000
No known party affiliation
24 Plant Street 4, New Haven , Ct 06515-1641
No known party affiliation
24 Plant Street 4, New Haven , Ct 06515-1641
No known party affiliation
24 Plant Street 3, New Haven , Ct 06515-0000
No known party affiliation
26 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618
No known party affiliation
27 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1619
No known party affiliation
28 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618
No known party affiliation
32 Plant Street 2 Fl, New Haven , Ct 06515-0000
No known party affiliation
32 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618
No known party affiliation
32 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618
No known party affiliation
32 Plant Street 2 Fl, New Haven , Ct 06515-1618
No known party affiliation
35 Plant Street, New Haven , Ct 06515-1619
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $16,046

Net Worth: $868,896

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.