Monica Lucia Robotin

Female, Age 47 Windsor, Connecticut

Monica Lucia Robotin is a 47 years old female, born on Sunday, 13th of October 1974. She will turn 48 on October 13, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 197 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3440 and is not affiliated with any political party. Monica is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 27, 2014.

Overview of Monica Lucia Robotin

Age: 47

Gender: female

Birth year: 1975

Lives in: Windsor

Monica Lucia Robotin's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 27, 2014

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: 330 Windsor Avenue

Voter ID: 004416047

Congressional District: 001

House District: 005

Senate District: 002

Monica Lucia Robotin Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Monica Lucia Robotin

168 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3438
No known party affiliation
171 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3439
No known party affiliation
171 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3439
No known party affiliation
171 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3439
No known party affiliation
172 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3438
No known party affiliation
172 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3438
No known party affiliation
195 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3440
No known party affiliation
203 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3440
No known party affiliation
203 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3440
No known party affiliation
203 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3440
No known party affiliation
203 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3440
No known party affiliation
204 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3441
No known party affiliation
204 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3441
No known party affiliation
204 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3441
No known party affiliation
210 Portman Street, Windsor, 06095-3441
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $14,206

Net Worth: $246,280

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.