Shawn Trevor Samuels

Male, Age 44 Bloomfield, Connecticut

Shawn Trevor Samuels is a 44 years old male, born on Friday, 2nd of March 1979. He will turn 45 on March 02, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 40 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3025 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Shawn is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 6, 2016.

Overview of Shawn Trevor Samuels

Age: 44

Gender: male

Birth year: 1979

Lives in: Bloomfield

Phone number: 860-967-2511

Shawn Trevor Samuels's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 6, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Metacomet Elementary School

Voter ID: 004406686

Congressional District: 001

House District: 015

Senate District: 002

Shawn Trevor Samuels Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Shawn Trevor Samuels

35 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
36 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3025
No known party affiliation
37 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
37 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
38 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3025
No known party affiliation
39 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
39 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
41 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
41 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
41 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
41 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
41 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation
43 Wesleyan Terrace, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3058
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $32,143

Net Worth: $543,165

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.