Lacia Ann Japp

Female, Age 28 Montville , Connecticut

Lacia Ann Japp is a 28 years old female, born on Saturday, 6th of January 1996. She will turn 29 on January 06, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 53 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217 and is not affiliated with any political party. Lacia is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 24, 2014. Our records show Paul E Japp (65), Anita C Japp (57) and Heather Lynn Japp (30) as possible relatives.

Overview of Lacia Ann Japp

Age: 28

Gender: female

Birth year: 1996

Lives in: Montville

Lacia Ann Japp's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 24, 2014

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Mohegan Elementary School

Voter ID: 004395859

Congressional District: 002

House District: 042

Senate District: 019

Lacia Ann Japp Adress & Maps

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lacia Ann Japp

2 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation
9 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-0000
No known party affiliation
9 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation
10 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation
10 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation
10 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation
61 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation
61 Point Breeze Road, Montville , Ct 06382-2217
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Lacia Ann Japp's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Montville , Ct
Born on: Saturday, 15th of February 1958
Gender: Male
Montville , Ct
Born on: Friday, 29th of April 1966
Gender: Female
Montville , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 2nd of March 1993
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $12,556

Net Worth: $545,976

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.