Maja Leah Fajardo

Female, Age 53 Greenwich , Connecticut

Maja Leah Fajardo is a 53 years old female, born on Thursday, 30th of July 1970. She will turn 54 on July 30, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 2 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229 and is not affiliated with any political party. Maja is registered to vote in Connecticut since April 2, 2014.

Overview of Maja Leah Fajardo

Age: 53

Gender: female

Birth year: 1970

Lives in: Greenwich

Maja Leah Fajardo's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: April 2, 2014

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Greenwich Town Hall

Voter ID: 004393169

Congressional District: 004

House District: 150

Senate District: 036

Maja Leah Fajardo Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Maja Leah Fajardo

1 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
1 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
2 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
2 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
2 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
4 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
4 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
5 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
8 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
8 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
11 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
11 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
12 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
12 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation
14 Sachem Lane, Greenwich , Ct 06830-7229
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $34,351

Net Worth: $126,876

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.