Hui Hu

Female, Age 55 Norwich, Connecticut

Hui Hu is a 55 years old female, born on Tuesday, 27th of August 1968. She will turn 56 on August 27, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 66 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4908 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Hui is registered to vote in Connecticut since February 3, 2014.

Overview of Hui Hu

Age: 55

Gender: female

Birth year: 1968

Lives in: Norwich

Phone number: 860-287-4416

Hui Hu's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: February 3, 2014

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: John B Stanton Elementary School

Voter ID: 004387855

Congressional District: 002

House District: 046

Senate District: 019

Hui Hu Adress & Maps

Show Map
Show Map

Mailing Address

000000000

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Hui Hu

45 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4919
No known party affiliation
45 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4919
No known party affiliation
45 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4919
No known party affiliation
45 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4919
No known party affiliation
50 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4916
No known party affiliation
55 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4919
No known party affiliation
58 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4916
No known party affiliation
67 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4919
No known party affiliation
69 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4908
No known party affiliation
69 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4908
No known party affiliation
71 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4908
No known party affiliation
72 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4916
No known party affiliation
72 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4916
No known party affiliation
72 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4908
No known party affiliation
73 Alice Street, Norwich, Ct 06360-4908
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $17,759

Net Worth: $209,224

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.