Lidya Desjardins Lauw

Female, Age 49 Danbury, Connecticut

Lidya Desjardins Lauw is a 49 years old female, born on Sunday, 3rd of June 1973. She will turn 50 on June 03, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 163 South Street 85, Danbury, 06810-7923 and is not affiliated with any political party. Lidya is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 7, 2013.

Overview of Lidya Desjardins Lauw

Age: 49

Gender: female

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: Danbury

Lidya Desjardins Lauw's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 7, 2013

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 10

District: 005

Polling place: War Memorial Gym

Voter ID: 004374824

Congressional District: 005

House District: 110

Senate District: 024

Lidya Desjardins Lauw Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lidya Desjardins Lauw

136 South Street 1, Danbury, 06810-8041
No known party affiliation
136 South Street 2, Danbury, 06810-8041
No known party affiliation
156 South Street, Danbury, 06810-7951
No known party affiliation
157 South Street B1, Danbury, 06810-7950
No known party affiliation
157 South Street B1, Danbury, 06810-7950
No known party affiliation
160 South Street, Danbury, 06810-7951
No known party affiliation
161 South Street, Danbury, 06810-7950
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 92, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 70, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 53, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 48, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 79, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 6, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 40, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation
163 South Street 57, Danbury, 06810-7923
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $77,489

Net Worth: $147,383

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.