Randy Andrew Fedor

Male, Age 32 Norwalk, Connecticut

Randy Andrew Fedor is a 32 years old male, born on Thursday, 9th of May 1991. He will turn 33 on May 09, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 60 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Randy is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 27, 2013.

Overview of Randy Andrew Fedor

Age: 32

Gender: male

Birth year: 1991

Lives in: Norwalk

Phone number: 203-952-6751

Randy Andrew Fedor's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 27, 2013

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 01

District: 137

Polling place: Marvin School

Voter ID: 004350437

Congressional District: 004

House District: 137

Senate District: 025

Randy Andrew Fedor Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Randy Andrew Fedor

56 Osborne Avenue 2, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
57 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1010
No known party affiliation
58 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
58 Osborne Avenue 2, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
58 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
58 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
58 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
60 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
61 Osborne Avenue A, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1010
No known party affiliation
61 Osborne Avenue A, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1010
No known party affiliation
61 Osborne Avenue A, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1010
No known party affiliation
62 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
62 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
62 Osborne Avenue 2, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1020
No known party affiliation
63 Osborne Avenue, Norwalk, Ct 06855-1010
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $62,413

Net Worth: $550,999

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.