Mark E Sears Jr

Male, Age 39 Enfield, Connecticut

Mark E Sears Jr is a 39 years old male, born on Wednesday, 11th of July 1984. He will turn 40 on July 11, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 60 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Mark is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 4, 2016.

Overview of Mark E Sears Jr

Age: 39

Gender: male

Birth year: 1984

Lives in: Enfield

Mark E Sears Jr's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 4, 2016

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 458

Polling place: Henry Barnard School

Voter ID: 004285501

Congressional District: 002

House District: 058

Senate District: 007

Mark E Sears Jr Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Mark E Sears Jr

58 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
58 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
58 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
58 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
59 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation
59 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation
59 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation
61 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation
61 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation
62 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
62 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
62 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
63 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation
64 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2938
No known party affiliation
65 Belmont Avenue, Enfield, Ct 06082-2935
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $32,983

Net Worth: $1,301,709

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.