1. Home
  2. Cities in Connecticut
  3. 06385 Waterford
  4. Raymond Lane

Alexa N Garvin

Female, Age 29 Waterford , Connecticut

Alexa N Garvin is a 29 years old female, born on Wednesday, 15th of June 1994. She will turn 30 on June 15, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 2 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1122 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Alexa is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 12, 2012. Our records show Martha L Garvin (57), Steven D Garvin (60) and Brooke Elizabeth Garvin (26) as possible relatives.

Overview of Alexa N Garvin

Age: 29

Gender: female

Birth year: 1995

Lives in: Waterford

Alexa N Garvin's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 12, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 003

Polling place: Oswegatchie School

Voter ID: 004273851

Congressional District: 002

House District: 038

Senate District: 020

Alexa N Garvin Adress & Maps

Show Map

Residential Address

2 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1122

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Alexa N Garvin

Marcia A Benvenuti(77)
1 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
Linda J Sullivan(71)
3 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
Joseph L Olbrys(84)
7 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
Susan Carol Locarno(60)
7 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1121
No known party affiliation
View all neighbors on 2 Raymond Lane, Waterford , Ct 06385-1122

Related Persons

Alexa N Garvin's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(57)
Waterford , Ct
Born on: Wednesday, 4th of May 1966
Gender: Unknown
(60)
Waterford , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 5th of November 1963
Gender: Male
(26)
Waterford , Ct
Born on: Saturday, 9th of August 1997
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $10,173

Net Worth: $354,600

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.