Stacy G Jacob

Female, Age 51 East Haven , Connecticut

Stacy G Jacob is a 51 years old female, born on Wednesday, 19th of April 1972. She will turn 52 on April 19, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 12 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Stacy is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 8, 2019.

Overview of Stacy G Jacob

Age: 51

Gender: female

Birth year: 1973

Lives in: East Haven

Stacy G Jacob's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 8, 2019

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 005

Polling place: Hays School

Voter ID: 004271674

Congressional District: 003

House District: 099

Senate District: 034

Stacy G Jacob Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Stacy G Jacob

4 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
4 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
4 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
7 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
7 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
7 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
8 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
15 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
15 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
25 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
25 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1085
No known party affiliation
26 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
26 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
26 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation
26 Erico Drive, East Haven , Ct 06512-1091
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $42,773

Net Worth: $305,679

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.