Alvin Lawe

Male, Age 33 Waterbury , Connecticut

Alvin Lawe is a 33 years old male, born on Monday, 12th of February 1990. He will turn 34 on February 12, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 191 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4132 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Alvin is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 10, 2012. Our records show Gia M Lawe (56) and Avery Lawe (32) as possible relatives.

Overview of Alvin Lawe

Age: 33

Gender: male

Birth year: 1990

Lives in: Waterbury

Phone number: 203-592-6503

Alvin Lawe's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 10, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 072

Polling place: Reed School

Voter ID: 004270254

Congressional District: 005

House District: 072

Senate District: 015

Alvin Lawe Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Alvin Lawe

180 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4131
No known party affiliation
180 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4131
No known party affiliation
182 Oak Street 2, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4131
No known party affiliation
182 Oak Street 1, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4131
No known party affiliation
183 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-0000
No known party affiliation
183 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4132
No known party affiliation
183 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4132
No known party affiliation
191 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4132
No known party affiliation
196 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-4131
No known party affiliation
329 Oak Street, Waterbury , Ct 06704-0000
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Alvin Lawe's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

(56)
Waterbury , Ct
Born on: Sunday, 30th of July 1967
Gender: Female
(32)
Waterbury , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 25th of June 1991
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $107,479

Net Worth: $840,940

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.