James J Murphy

Male, Age 32 New Haven , Connecticut

James J Murphy is a 32 years old male, born on Monday, 22nd of April 1991. He will turn 33 on April 22, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 168 Park Street 4, New Haven , Ct 06511-4812 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. James is registered to vote in Connecticut since September 21, 2012.

Overview of James J Murphy

Age: 32

Gender: male

Birth year: 1991

Lives in: New Haven

James J Murphy's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: September 21, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 02

District: 002

Polling place: Troup Academy

Voter ID: 004247951

Congressional District: 003

House District: 093

Senate District: 010

James J Murphy Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for James J Murphy

165 Park Street 9, New Haven , Ct 06511-4809
No known party affiliation
165 Park Street 5, New Haven , Ct 06511-4809
No known party affiliation
165 Park Street 10, New Haven , Ct 06511-4809
No known party affiliation
166 Park Street 6, New Haven , Ct 06511-4822
No known party affiliation
166 Park Street 7, New Haven , Ct 06511-4822
No known party affiliation
166 Park Street 8, New Haven , Ct 06511-4822
No known party affiliation
166 Park Street 8, New Haven , Ct 06511-4822
No known party affiliation
168 Park Street, New Haven , Ct 06511-4812
No known party affiliation
168 Park Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06511-4812
No known party affiliation
168 Park Street 1, New Haven , Ct 06511-4812
No known party affiliation
170 Park Street 1, New Haven , Ct 06511-4808
No known party affiliation
170 Park Street 1, New Haven , Ct 06511-4808
No known party affiliation
170 Park Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06511-4808
No known party affiliation
170 Park Street 1, New Haven , Ct 06511-4808
No known party affiliation
170 Park Street 2, New Haven , Ct 06511-4808
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $112,479

Net Worth: $979,597

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.