Lauren Hartley Mercik

Female, Age 32 Suffield , Connecticut

Lauren Hartley Mercik is a 32 years old female, born on Monday, 8th of April 1991. She will turn 33 on April 08, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 136 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1235 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Lauren is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 21, 2012. Our records show Maryellen Mercik (61), David Peter Mercik (61) and Kyle Mercik (30) as possible relatives.

Overview of Lauren Hartley Mercik

Age: 32

Gender: female

Birth year: 1991

Lives in: Suffield

Phone number: 860-668-1519

Lauren Hartley Mercik's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 21, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Suffield Middle School

Voter ID: 004230714

Congressional District: 002

House District: 061

Senate District: 007

Lauren Hartley Mercik Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Lauren Hartley Mercik

124 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1235
No known party affiliation
125 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1237
No known party affiliation
125 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1237
No known party affiliation
125 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1237
No known party affiliation
133 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1237
No known party affiliation
133 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1237
No known party affiliation
133 Cold Spring Lane, Suffield , Ct 06078-1237
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Lauren Hartley Mercik's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Suffield , Ct
Born on: Tuesday, 9th of January 1962
Gender: Unknown
Suffield , Ct
Born on: Thursday, 10th of May 1962
Gender: Male
Suffield , Ct
Born on: Monday, 8th of March 1993
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $71,717

Net Worth: $1,215,238

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.