Jennifer Zehler

Female, Age 62 Branford, Connecticut

Jennifer Zehler is a 62 years old female, born on Wednesday, 20th of December 1961. She will turn 63 on December 20, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 4 Kenwood Lane B, Branford, Ct 06405-6252 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jennifer is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 19, 2012.

Overview of Jennifer Zehler

Age: 62

Gender: female

Birth year: 1962

Lives in: Branford

Jennifer Zehler's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 19, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Branford Fire Headquarters

Voter ID: 004212427

Congressional District: 003

House District: 102

Senate District: 012

Jennifer Zehler Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jennifer Zehler

4 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
5 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6254
No known party affiliation
10 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
15 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6254
No known party affiliation
16 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
16 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
24 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
24 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
29 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6254
No known party affiliation
29 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6254
No known party affiliation
29 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6254
No known party affiliation
32 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
32 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
38 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation
38 Kenwood Lane, Branford, Ct 06405-6252
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $98,385

Net Worth: $602,050

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.