Shem Alex Joseph

Male, Age 45 Danbury, Connecticut

Shem Alex Joseph is a 45 years old male, born on Saturday, 4th of November 1978. He will turn 46 on November 04, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 13 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6433 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Shem is registered to vote in Connecticut since March 15, 2018.

Overview of Shem Alex Joseph

Age: 45

Gender: male

Birth year: 1978

Lives in: Danbury

Phone number: 646-323-0044

Shem Alex Joseph's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: March 15, 2018

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 10

District: 006

Polling place: Park Avenue School Gym

Voter ID: 004204585

Congressional District: 005

House District: 110

Senate District: 024

Shem Alex Joseph Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Shem Alex Joseph

8 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
8 Lee Avenue 2nd Fl, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
8 Lee Avenue 1, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
8 Lee Avenue 2nd Fl, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
8 Lee Avenue 1, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
9 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6433
No known party affiliation
12 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
13 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6433
No known party affiliation
14 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
15 Lee Avenue Apt. 2, Danbury, Ct 06810-6433
No known party affiliation
15 Lee Avenue Apt. 2, Danbury, Ct 06810-6433
No known party affiliation
15 Lee Avenue 1, Danbury, Ct 06810-6433
No known party affiliation
16 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
16 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation
16 Lee Avenue, Danbury, Ct 06810-6459
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $6,290

Net Worth: $26,823

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.