Rosemary F Reeve

Female, Age 82 Southington, Connecticut

Rosemary F Reeve is a 82 years old female, born on Friday, 31st of January 1941. She will turn 83 on January 31, 2025. Our records show she currently resides at 6 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1425 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Rosemary is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 14, 2012.

Overview of Rosemary F Reeve

Age: 82

Gender: female

Birth year: 1942

Lives in: Southington

Phone number: 860-276-2017

Rosemary F Reeve's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 14, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 007

Polling place: Kelley School

Voter ID: 004203695

Congressional District: 001

House District: 080

Senate District: 016

Rosemary F Reeve Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Rosemary F Reeve

1 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1426
No known party affiliation
1 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1426
No known party affiliation
2 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1425
No known party affiliation
2 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1425
No known party affiliation
4 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1425
No known party affiliation
8 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1425
No known party affiliation
8 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1425
No known party affiliation
9 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1426
No known party affiliation
10 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1465
No known party affiliation
10 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1465
No known party affiliation
14 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1465
No known party affiliation
15 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1466
No known party affiliation
16 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1465
No known party affiliation
17 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1466
No known party affiliation
18 Oak Road, Southington, Ct 06489-1465
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $28,696

Net Worth: $593,648

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.