Gail Sartori

Female, Age 66 Burlington, Connecticut

Gail Sartori is a 66 years old female, born on Saturday, 2nd of February 1957. She will turn 67 on February 02, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 1 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401 and is not affiliated with any political party. Gail is registered to vote in Connecticut since November 28, 2011.

Overview of Gail Sartori

Age: 66

Gender: female

Birth year: 1957

Lives in: Burlington

Gail Sartori's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: November 28, 2011

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Town Hall

Voter ID: 004179485

Congressional District: 005

House District: 076

Senate District: 005

Gail Sartori Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Gail Sartori

5 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
5 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
7 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
7 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
9 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
9 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
12 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
15 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
15 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
15 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
16 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
16 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
18 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
19 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation
22 Woodhaven Dr, Burlington, Ct 06013-2401
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $52,930

Net Worth: $274,706

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.