Yuji Choi

Female, Age 63 East Lyme , Connecticut

Yuji Choi is a 63 years old female, born on Sunday, 17th of July 1960. She will turn 64 on July 17, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 46 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108 and is not affiliated with any political party. Yuji is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 17, 2011.

Overview of Yuji Choi

Age: 63

Gender: female

Birth year: 1960

Lives in: East Lyme

Yuji Choi's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 17, 2011

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: East Lyme High School

Voter ID: 004170083

Congressional District: 002

House District: 037

Senate District: 020

Yuji Choi Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Yuji Choi

41 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
41 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
44 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108
No known party affiliation
44 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108
No known party affiliation
45 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
45 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
45 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
46 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108
No known party affiliation
46 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108
No known party affiliation
46 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108
No known party affiliation
46 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1108
No known party affiliation
47 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
47 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1109
No known party affiliation
48 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1110
No known party affiliation
48 Heritage Road, East Lyme , Ct 06333-1110
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $67,381

Net Worth: $755,427

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.