Ifeoma J Nwokoye

Female, Age 47 New Haven , Connecticut

Ifeoma J Nwokoye is a 47 years old female, born on Friday, 20th of June 1975. She will turn 48 on June 20, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 61 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Ifeoma is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 31, 2011.

Overview of Ifeoma J Nwokoye

Age: 47

Gender: female

Birth year: 1976

Lives in: New Haven

Phone number: 347-681-7196

Ifeoma J Nwokoye's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 31, 2011

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 019

Polling place: Celentano Museum Academy

Voter ID: 004160969

Congressional District: 003

House District: 094

Senate District: 011

Ifeoma J Nwokoye Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Ifeoma J Nwokoye

15 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
29 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
29 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
31 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
37 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
55 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
55 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
61 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
77 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
77 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
85 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
85 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
97 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation
97 Loomis Place, New Haven , Ct 06511-2222
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $48,805

Net Worth: $1,110,252

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.