Kyle J Yocum

Male, Age 30 Wallingford, Connecticut

Kyle J Yocum is a 30 years old male, born on Sunday, 4th of April 1993. He will turn 31 on April 04, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 52 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024 and is not affiliated with any political party. Kyle is registered to vote in Connecticut since June 3, 2011. Our records show Laura Lee Yocum (61) and John C Yocum (58) as possible relatives.

Overview of Kyle J Yocum

Age: 30

Gender: male

Birth year: 1993

Lives in: Wallingford

Kyle J Yocum's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: June 3, 2011

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 00

District: 002

Polling place: Evarts C. Stevens School

Voter ID: 004148556

Congressional District: 003

House District: 085

Senate District: 034

Kyle J Yocum Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Kyle J Yocum

44 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024
No known party affiliation
45 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5009
No known party affiliation
45 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5009
No known party affiliation
48 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024
No known party affiliation
48 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024
No known party affiliation
49 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5009
No known party affiliation
49 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5009
No known party affiliation
55 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024
No known party affiliation
55 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024
No known party affiliation
56 Laurel Drive, Wallingford, Ct 06492-5024
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Kyle J Yocum's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Wallingford, Ct
Born on: Thursday, 2nd of August 1962
Gender: Female
Wallingford, Ct
Born on: Monday, 16th of August 1965
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $21,410

Net Worth: $1,525,098

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.