Siavash Samei

Male, Age 36 Windham, Connecticut

Siavash Samei is a 36 years old male, born on Saturday, 7th of February 1987. He will turn 37 on February 07, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 65 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Siavash is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 1, 2012.

Overview of Siavash Samei

Age: 36

Gender: male

Birth year: 1987

Lives in: Windham

Phone number: 860-280-1161

Siavash Samei's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 1, 2012

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 006

Polling place: Bpo Elks 1311

Voter ID: 004121861

Congressional District: 002

House District: 049

Senate District: 029

Siavash Samei Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Siavash Samei

50 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
50 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
50 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
59 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343
No known party affiliation
60 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
60 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
60 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
65 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343
No known party affiliation
66 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
66 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3302
No known party affiliation
67 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343
No known party affiliation
67 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343
No known party affiliation
67 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343
No known party affiliation
67 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3343
No known party affiliation
79 Hayden Street, Windham, Ct 06226-3341
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $50,618

Net Worth: $602,263

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.