Craig A Puffenberger

Male, Age 62 Roxbury, Connecticut

Craig A Puffenberger is a 62 years old male, born on Tuesday, 21st of March 1961. He will turn 63 on March 21, 2025. Our records show he currently resides at 95 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1710 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Craig is registered to vote in Connecticut since October 7, 2010.

Overview of Craig A Puffenberger

Age: 62

Gender: male

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: Roxbury

Phone number: 860-799-7522

Craig A Puffenberger's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: October 7, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 001

Polling place: Roxbury Town Hall

Voter ID: 004109132

Congressional District: 005

House District: 069

Senate District: 032

Craig A Puffenberger Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Craig A Puffenberger

53 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1625
No known party affiliation
67 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1710
No known party affiliation
67 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1710
No known party affiliation
72 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1709
No known party affiliation
72 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1709
No known party affiliation
77 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1710
No known party affiliation
77 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1710
No known party affiliation
132 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1712
No known party affiliation
132 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1712
No known party affiliation
139 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1711
No known party affiliation
139 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1711
No known party affiliation
150 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1712
No known party affiliation
159 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1711
No known party affiliation
159 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1711
No known party affiliation
159 Apple Lane, Roxbury, Ct 06783-1711
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $86,997

Net Worth: $440,106

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.