Uhna Sung

Female, Age 62 New Haven , Connecticut

Uhna Sung is a 62 years old female, born on Sunday, 25th of December 1960. She will turn 63 on December 25, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 111 Park Street 12b, New Haven , 06511-5412 and is not affiliated with any political party. Uhna is registered to vote in Connecticut since August 18, 2010.

Overview of Uhna Sung

Age: 62

Gender: female

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: New Haven

Phone number: 615-438-0219

Uhna Sung's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: August 18, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: I

Precinct: 02

District: 002

Polling place: Troup Academy

Voter ID: 004099918

Congressional District: 003

House District: 093

Senate District: 010

Uhna Sung Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Uhna Sung

104 Park Street, New Haven , 06511-5487
No known party affiliation
104 Park Street, New Haven , 06511-5402
No known party affiliation
106 Park Street, New Haven , 06511-5488
No known party affiliation
106 Park Street 2m, New Haven , 06511-5488
No known party affiliation
106 Park Street 1, New Haven , 06511-5488
No known party affiliation
106 Park Street 1, New Haven , 06511-5488
No known party affiliation
109 Park Street 9, New Haven , 06511-5401
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 9d, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 5c, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 71, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 9c, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 3t, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 3d, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 8n, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation
111 Park Street 12o, New Haven , 06511-5412
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $72,591

Net Worth: $591,957

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.