Julian B Watkins

Male, Age 31 Bloomfield, Connecticut

Julian B Watkins is a 31 years old male, born on Saturday, 26th of October 1991. He will turn 32 on October 26, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 62 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Julian is registered to vote in Connecticut since July 27, 2010. Our records show David Watkins (60) and Jordan A Watkins (26) as possible relatives.

Overview of Julian B Watkins

Age: 31

Gender: male

Birth year: 1992

Lives in: Bloomfield

Phone number: 860-810-9018

Julian B Watkins's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: July 27, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 00

District: 004

Polling place: Metacomet Elementary School

Voter ID: 004094269

Congressional District: 001

House District: 015

Senate District: 002

Julian B Watkins Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Julian B Watkins

42 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
42 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
46 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
50 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
50 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
58 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
58 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
62 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation
62 Croydon Drive, Bloomfield, Ct 06002-3446
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Julian B Watkins's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

Bloomfield, Ct
Born on: Saturday, 20th of October 1962
Gender: Male
Bloomfield, Ct
Born on: Thursday, 1st of May 1997
Gender: Male

Income

Salary: $48,536

Net Worth: $812,947

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.