Jill Daigle

Female, Age 48 Bristol, Connecticut

Jill Daigle is a 48 years old female, born on Monday, 5th of May 1975. She will turn 49 on May 05, 2024. Our records show she currently resides at 29 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345 and is affiliated with the No known party affiliation. Jill is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 20, 2010.

Overview of Jill Daigle

Age: 48

Gender: female

Birth year: 1976

Lives in: Bristol

Phone number: 860-845-8206

Jill Daigle's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 20, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 079

Polling place: Bristol Elks Club

Voter ID: 004083637

Congressional District: 001

House District: 079

Senate District: 031

Jill Daigle Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Jill Daigle

30 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
37 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
40 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
40 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
44 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
47 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
47 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
47 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
47 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
50 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
50 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
50 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation
55 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
55 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7345
No known party affiliation
58 Maurice Street, Bristol, Ct 06010-7344
No known party affiliation

Income

Salary: $16,908

Net Worth: $709,380

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.