Curtis John

Male, Age 62 New Haven , Connecticut

Curtis John is a 62 years old male, born on Thursday, 15th of June 1961. He will turn 63 on June 15, 2024. Our records show he currently resides at 89 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1702 and is not affiliated with any political party. Curtis is registered to vote in Connecticut since May 13, 2010. Our records show Fedelie John (63) and Adisa L John (29) as possible relatives.

Overview of Curtis John

Age: 62

Gender: male

Birth year: 1961

Lives in: New Haven

Phone number: 203-469-8635

Curtis John's Voting Profile

Registered to vote since: May 13, 2010

Party Affiliation: No known party affiliation

Status: A

Precinct: 02

District: 011

Polling place: Bishop Woods School

Voter ID: 004081750

Congressional District: 003

House District: 097

Senate District: 011

Curtis John Adress & Maps

Show Map

Thomas Gerard Adams

Neighbors for Curtis John

63 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1702
No known party affiliation
63 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1702
No known party affiliation
64 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
72 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
78 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
84 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
84 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
92 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
92 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation
92 Daniel Drive, New Haven , Ct 06513-1701
No known party affiliation

Related Persons

Curtis John's parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and other extended family members.

New Haven , Ct
Born on: Sunday, 28th of February 1960
Gender: Female
New Haven , Ct
Born on: Friday, 11th of February 1994
Gender: Female

Income

Salary: $84,542

Net Worth: $258,630

*This information is estimated by an algorithm and does not come from any public data. These numbers are only guesses and should not be considered to be accurate.